This article will be a comprehensive guide of every part needed to make a quad that can fly. Feel free to skip to the subheadings you care about if you know enough about some components already.
As well as a standalone guide to the parts needed to make a flying quad, this will also be the first article in a multi-part series of building your own FPV racing quad. The other parts will be "What do you need to build an FPV system", "What parts you've forgotten to buy/ that no one told you you'd need" and "How to assemble a fully functioning FPV racing quad".
The aim of this guide isn't to tell you what to do, it's just a resource. I will make sure I tell you areas where you are free, even encouraged, to do your own thing. This is going to be YOUR quadcopter, so make sure you build it with yourself in mind.
So, without further ado, what are the materials you're going to need to build your quadcopter?
Frame - You're going to need to make some decisions at this point. And they should probably be your first decisions. For example, what size quadcopter do you intend on building? I think the most popular size to build is still the 250 quad (meaning 250mm diagonally from motor to motor), so for the purposes of this article the 'virtual quad' we'll be building will be a 250 quad. Of course feel free to choose a different size based on your own preference, this guide should still be just as useful. There's been an increase in popularity recently with smaller quads, mainly 210s and 180s. A lot of people find that these quads are more aerobatic and can roll and pitch faster. The downsides to quads of that size is they can't really use 5-inch props, especially 180s. And they certainly can't use 6-inch props, which a number of 250s can. This can lead to stricter weight requirements and when you want to strap a GoPro/similar camera on top, you're really going to notice it. A nice little video from Rotor Riot (linked
here) touches on some of these points.
Another important consideration about your frame is the material. This is what will really separate the race quads from other platforms. For a race quad there is really only two options, fibreglass or carbon fibre. Obviously weight is a large reason why those materials are the best options but there are other, arguably more important, reasons too. Racing quads need to be stiff, really stiff. You want all the thrust from your motors being used to push your quad through the sky, you don't want some of that thrust being used up by flexing the frame. Even slight flexing can cause a noticeable difference in power. Another reason why these materials are the best is because racing quads crash. They crash a lot, and they crash hard. Other materials just wouldn't handle that punishment. That being said, it's not impossible to break these frames and this is one of the main reasons why carbon fibre is the better of the two options. Both are tough but both can still break, carbon fibre just takes a lot more force before it gets to that point.
So after choosing the size and the material what are the options we have to pick from. Well in my opinion there's two categories, premium and cheap. My best suggestion is to decide on an amount you're willing to spend on a frame and then go and see what that can get you. Check some reviews of the frame on YouTube etc. and then buy it at the cheapest price you can find. Personally, when I built my first race quad, I went cheap. I bought a ZMR250 V2 frame. It's carbon fibre but very cheap (I think it was around £25 but I'll check that later (regardless it was super cheap compared to the £200+ premium frames)). The main differences in premium and cheap frames is build quality and customer support. Generic Chinese made frames like the ZMR will have no support beyond that of the sellers own policies whereas a name such as Lumenier, Blackout or Alien will offer you a bit more support. You might find (as I did) that not all the holes on a ZMR frame line up. But a bit of persistence and improvisation and you can make the holes bigger by twisting allen keys (hex keys) through them. Problem solved. Of course, like everything else in this build, the choice is entirely yours. After you've selected your frame, the next thing to think about is the power pack (the motors, props, ESCs and LiPo battery).

Power pack - I will give a separate guide to choosing each of these components in a moment. But first it's important to understand that you can't choose these components entirely independently, they must work together. The reason for this is to do with the electronics of the machine, bigger and more aggressive props will work a motor harder (can the motors cope?), a harder working motor will draw more current and potentially need higher voltage (can the ESCs cope?) and demanding ESCs need to pull much more current (can the LiPo cope?). So, Now to explain exactly how to choose these components...
Props - The propellors of your mini quad, though important, shouldn't be what you spend most of your time worrying about. You're going to break your first propellors, you're going to break your second propellors and you're going to break every set you ever own. Not cause you're a bad pilot, but because that's just the nature of these types of drones. So with that said, what is there to consider when buying props?
The diameter is the single most important thing with choosing props. You want to choose a prop big enough to provide enough lift to your quad but not so big that it doesn't fit the frame. Generally the best thing to do is to choose the biggest props that fit your frame. Bigger props are more efficient and therefore use less battery power to provide the same amount of thrust (or more thrust for the same amount of power). For most race quads, you will use 4, 5 or 6 inch props. 4 inches is what you'll use for 180s and some 210s. Some 210s are also able to support 5 inch props. 250s will almost always use 5-inch props or 6-inches if they fit. I can't speak for every frame, but I know the ZMR250 V2 does support 6-inch propellors as it's what I use, they clear the frame and each other with a few mm spare. (Be warned, a lot of people have had trouble with 6-inch props on the ZMR V1 (the props overlap) as you can see in many videos on YouTube). The second thing to consider with props is their pitch. Pitch is the distance the prop would travel through a gel in one full revolution, if it were a screw. Essentially, the larger the pitch, the more aggressive the propellor. Aggressive props are great for speed and acrobatics but terrible for power consumption (they're much less efficient at low speeds)but using them will require motors with higher torque and all the downstream effects of that (ie. bigger ESCs and a higher C battery). Another consideration with props is the number of blades. Like pitch, the more blades a prop has, the more powerful it is but it is also much less efficient. The options are mainly 2 or 3 blade props and you should try both to see what works best for you. If you don't know, I would recommend 2 blades unless its a really small 180. While material does play a part in a props performance, I have found that the brand of prop is far more important and can affect the props characteristics more than material. So with that, my advice for a beginner, or someone who wants just a good all-round prop, would be to get the Gemfan 5x3 (5x3/5030 etc. All means the same) for a 250 quad. The Gemfan 5x3 is a cheap prop that still manages to arrive well balanced and ready to fly. They're a bit more flexible than a lot of other props and while this means a little less punch and responsiveness, it also means a bit more durability and forgiveness. If your frame is able to take 6-inch props, try the HQ 6x3. Gemfan's 6-inch props are just too weak; the flexibility that makes them so great as a 5-inch means they can break mid flight as a 6-inch. The HQ prop is much more rigid and is great fun to fly. With prop choice, bare in mind a 3-inch pitch is the lowest you want to try. It's a great pitch for learning and even after you become Charpu-level good! But anything lower and the 'punchiness' to the quad might disappear.

Motors - The motors are a very important component to a racing quad, or any multi rotor for that matter. Motors used in the hobby are almost exclusively brushless; this means the rotor (the bit that moves) isn't in direct contact with the stator (the bit that stays still), reducing friction. Theres a number of different options when it comes to motors, such as 1806 2300kV or 2204 2100kV. But what does any of that mean? The first number (e.g. 1806) tells us the size of the motor. In the case of an 1806 motor, it is saying the stator diameter is 18mm and the stator height is 6 mm. Broadly speaking, the larger the motor (especially diameter) the more torque it will have. High torque is necessary to swing larger props. So if your quad is running anything bigger, or with a more aggressive pitch, than a 6x3, you will need a 2204 or more. 6x3s and most 5-inch props on a 250 quad will run well on 1806s and smaller props, on smaller quads, may need even smaller motors. The reason small props actually require smaller motors is due to the second number, the kV rating. kV is how many thousand revolutions per volt the motor can produce. In order to produce enough lift on a smaller prop, the motor has to spin faster and therefore have a higher kV rating. Its easier to spin a smaller motor faster and with less torque than a bigger motor and therefore, a small prop might need a small motor just because the bigger ones won't spin fast enough. For a 250 quad, anything between 2000-2300kV should be pretty perfect, though you may want to research more into motor sizes and speeds if you plan on making a different sized quad. Motors are sticking out on the arms of your quad and they WILL take a beating when you crash. When choosing your motors, think about the price it will cost to replace them if you need to and also read reviews to see if they are durable at all. I personally use DYS 1806 2300kV motors on my ZMR and have put them through hell. I just pick the mud out and they're ready to fly again in no time. I know I don't treat them as well as I should but they still are doing well, so they're definitely a good motor in my opinion. But of course, choose your own motor based on what you want from your quad.

ESCs - The main consideration when choosing ESCs is the amount of current they can handle. Now that you know what prop you're going to be using and you've chosen an appropriate motor, you can work out the current each motor will draw. Each motor will come with (or have online) a max current rating. This could be 7A, 10A, 12A etc. When buying your ESCs, you will need to make sure they are rated for a current ABOVE what your max motor draw will be. You could probably get away with having 10A ESCs for a 10A motor, but they'll probably get quite warm after a hard flight and it's not worth the risk of blowing them out in my opinion. After knowing what the max current of your ESCs will be, all the other features of this component are completely personal preference. I don't want to talk much about electronic firm/software in this guide as I could probably write a whole other article just on that topic however there is a firmware choice to make when choosing your ESCs. ESCs for multirotors all essentially run one of two different firmwares, BLHeli or SimonK. For most people, it really doesn't matter, both will work just perfectly. However there is a definite benefit of BLHeli ESCs to SimonK ESCs for those of us who really care - Oneshot and active damping. I believe SimonK also supports oneshot (essentially a way to speed up and increase accuracy in the response of the motors to your commands) but active damping (actively slowing the props when you lower the throttle as oppose to freewheeling the props down), which is a significant advantage in racing and aerobatics, is only on BLHeli (I believe). So you may want to consider the firmware when choosing your ESCs.
One final ESC consideration is whether or not they are 'opto' ESCs. A 3-cell LiPo provides up to 12V to the circuitry of the aircraft. A lot of flight controllers (as well as other electronics you may wish to put on the drone) will only be able to take 5V inputs. Some ESCs contain 'polulu' or 'BEC' circuitry which 'steps down' the 12V to 5V and enables your flight controller to take power from the ESCs in order to function. So called 'opto' ESCs do not contain these circuits. This may seem like a negative at first but it means that the ESCs are smaller, lighter, less likely to overheat and importantly, cheaper.
I personally use DYS 10A opto ESCs running BLHeli (with Oneshot and active damping enabled), but of course, like everything else, what you choose is up to you.
LiPo - The lithium polymer (LiPo) battery is the part of your drone that supplies all of the power to every component while airborne. LiPos have to be able to store large amounts of energy and they also have to be able to release large amounts of energy very fast. These properties make this battery something that MUST be respected (as can be seen
here), but I will cover LiPo safety in a later post. When choosing your LiPo you will need to consider three things - the C rating, the capacity (mAh) and the number of cells (S number / Voltage). Firstly, don't choose a voltage higher than what your ESCs or motors can handle. If the other components want a 3S battery, don't put a 4S battery on. For most 250 quads you will use a 3S or 4S (if the components/you can handle the power). In order to choose the capacity and C rating you must first understand that they are linked. Using the max current your ESCs can draw, and adding it all up for each ESC, you can calculate the max current the battery will be required to deliver. For example, 4 10A ESCs will mean a battery must provide at least 40A. In order to work out how many amps a battery can deliver safely you must take its capacity (in Ah(e.g. 1500 mAh becomes 1.5Ah)) and multiply that by the C rating (if the C rating is a range, use the smaller number). So a 1500mAh 35-70C battery will deliver 52.5A (1.5Ah x 35C = 52.5A). Because these numbers are linked, the smaller the batteries capacity, the higher the C rating will need to be. Another thing to remember when choosing batteries is that more capacity = more weight = more power consumption, so a bigger battery doesn't always mean longer flights. My recommendation is choosing a battery somewhere in between 1300-1800mAh and working out the C rating you need based on your own system. My recommendations are essentially all the batteries I currently use: Nanotech 1500mAh 35-70C 3S, Turnigy 1600mAh 20-30C 3S. Both of these batteries work absolutely perfectly although I do prefer the extra punch of the nanotech. I will be getting a Turnigy Graphene 1500mAh 65C 3S tomorrow though and will be making a video featuring its use as well as writing about it here in the coming days (subscribe to TheDroneSite YouTube channel
here and keep checking this blog for more). My batteries are all very good though I have no experience with true 'premium' batteries.
Now that we've covered the 'power pack' theres only a couple more components required for the actual quad itself
Power Distribution Board (optional) - This component doesn't need such a long explanation. It does exactly what it says. You plug the battery to this board and then it supplies power to each ESC, your FPV system, LEDs and (if it contains a BEC/polulu circuit) your flight controller. Its not a necessary component but I would recommend it. I tried to build my ZMR super cheap and did not buy a power distribution board. I got fed up with the wiring though and decided it'd be better to spend the £2 it cost me to get a little distribution board with built in BEC. Its dramatically saved weight, due to less wiring, saved time and saved me from having to use bigger ESCs (I can use opto ESCs as this has a BEC to power my flight controller with 5V). As for recommendations, it's hard to go wrong with this one. Get a PDB that is cheap and that you think will fit well within your quad.
Flight Controller - There's a lot of options here. Flight controllers are very much personal preference and theres only really one big quantifiable difference. F1 or F3 boards. Broadly it effects the speed at which the board can work and how well the quad is tuned but the difference won't be noticeable to all but a few. I personally use the Naze32 acro, it's an F1 board with brilliant functionality on a racing quad. It has a very good gyro, accelerometer and barometer as well as the ability to add other functions such as GPS/telemetry. In my opinion there is no need to get anything better than this board for a racing quad although if you feel like you want to do more then research other boards with features such as magnetometers etc. Much more will be said about this component in a following post about software/firmware so keep checking back on the blog for that.

So that's it for this post, this was a comprehensive run down of the components actually needed to build a quad that can fly. Of course, if you're up to following the series of posts I am doing on building your own racing quad, this was only the beginning and there will be at least 3 more posts on the subject - "Parts for the FPV system", "Parts you will forget that no other guide ever tells you that you'll need" and of course, "The Building Guide".
I hope you found some of this useful to you, remember to stay tuned in to this blog for the following parts of this guide as well as other topics and (forgive me for yet another plug to my YouTube channel) subscribe to TheDroneSite YouTube channel
here to see some more tips as well as my upcoming 'Drone vlog' series, following me as I try to learn more about the hobby.
And of course, Happy Flying!!